麥當勞和肯德基在國外是否被認為是垃圾食品？

pansz2014-03-12 14:38:15

詢問過歐美人士，得到的答案是肯定的，他們確實屬於 Junk food。

不過這是翻譯的詞彙，Junk food（垃圾食品）是指高熱量、高糖、高脂肪，低維生素，低礦物質的食品。

炸雞與炸薯條類食品顯然屬於 Junk food，我們把它翻譯成垃圾食品。

他們的名字叫垃圾食品，但並不意味著對身體有很大危害，只是對減肥有害而已。在食品衛生方面，很可能比國內小店更強。

知乎使用者2014-03-12 14:45:19

知乎使用者2014-03-12 18:09:41

我學校旁邊的麥當勞，薯條可以換成（目測分量更大的）沙拉，飲料可以換成礦泉水或果汁。至於漢堡，那是幹活幹瘋了救命用的。減肥失敗怨飲食的，啊哈哈哈你不會看選單麼。

匿名使用者2014-03-13 04:52:14

。。。In U。S。， People do believe McDonald‘s food is junk food。

There are mainly three reasons：

1。 People’s perception is that their food has high calories。

2. Their food is processed food. (none of the answers I saw hit this point)

It is not the ingredients of burgers that lack nutrition. It is the fact that they have been industrially processed which makes people think they are unhealthy.

In a word, the food there is not freshly cooked.

3. Cheap.

But is this really the truth？

Who knows。

McDonald‘s has been trying to lose the unhealthy image for a long time。 However， the association of McDonald’s with junk food is still so deep in people‘s mind。

McDonald’s has a section on their websites devoted to explaining that their food is not that unhealthy：

Nutrition Choices ：： McDonalds。com

On there， you can find a calorie chart：

http：//

nutrition。mcdonalds。com

/getnutrition/nutritionfacts。pdf

If this is the truth， then in theory its food is actually not that bad。 Calories from fat are a bit high but overall calories are pretty low （even though it still hasn‘t reached the degree of being healthy）

But they still can not convince people that their industrial process doesn't affect the nutrition in their food.

Anyway， the fact is， someone actually did lose 56 pounds eating only McDonald’s for 90 days：

Man loses 56 pounds after eating only McDonald‘s for six months

知乎使用者2014-03-15 01:43:12

其實這些食物最大的特點是“標準化”，這種工業標準下製成的食物就像統一印刷的文化衫，能穿，還就絕對讓各種身材的人都找到把自己裝進去的尺碼，至於好不好看，誰在乎呢……

標準化的東西最大的好處是安全，雖然央視不遺餘力在黑肯德基麥當勞星巴克balabala，但是能夠保證你行走在陌生的城市中，花個10塊20塊吃到衛生放心而且味道不出乎意料的食物，恐怕只有這些“垃圾食物”了，路邊的蒼蠅館子即使有大眾點評的推薦你敢去嗎？